Hello StumbleUpon users! Would appreciate a thumbs up from the article you're reading! No Debt Plan is a blog about living a debt-free life. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed (e-mail subscription also available). Learn more about me, or some of my most popular posts. Thanks for visiting!
I was planning on talking about buying a scooter to save on gas costs today, but I got an interesting comment yesterday that I felt warranted discussion.
The comment was left on my post about earning more than $400 in free cash back using my credit card. I said in the post that I think Dave Ramsey is flat out wrong for his anti-credit stance. Here’s the comment:
Nice try trashing Dave Ramsey for no reasons. I sincerely request to think twice before you trash him again. He is not preaching to cut plastic or get out of debt for normal people like me and you who manage debt prudently. His target audience is way over the head in credit card debt and their finance charges for one month is greater than your annual cash back from Amex Blue. For people like these it makes perfect sense to not use credit card. Think about it before you cash in your rebate check next time - Amex/Discover charge about 3% for gas station operator, you are paid 5% rebate for charge the gas expense to their card - guess what - the rest of 2% is paid to you from the 29% interest rate and insane finance charges and cruel penalties these credit card companies charge to people who are already in deep trouble. Pick up the documentary “In debt we trust” from the local library and open your eyes.
For starters, I’m glad this person commented on the blog. It opens up the discussion, and heck, I love getting opinions that challenge my own. So I am not writing about this to just rip this person’s argument apart or anything. I just disagree.
Dave Ramsey is a big name author and radio personality in the personal finance world. He went through very hard financial times in the 1980’s and has bounced back to make millions of dollars. He has written several popular books, and always tells his listener’s to stick with his “Baby Steps” to financial freedom.
Here are those baby steps:
- $1,000 to start an emergency fund
- Pay off all debt using the debt snowball
- Save up 3-6 months of expenses
- Invest 15% of your income into Roth IRAs and other pre-tax retirement vehicles
- College funding for children
- Pay off home early
- Build wealth and give; invest in mutual funds and real estate
Now that all seems well and good on the surface. And I agree with the commentor’s point — Ramsey’s system is not designed to be used by me. I have a handle on our finances. His system is the life buoy thrown from the coast guard ship to the people on the sinking vessel who don’t know how to get out of their situation. I buy that.
And I am also not arguing against the point that his system gets people out of debt. It does. But, like any system, it has flaws and could be improved. I have three major beefs with his system.
First, Dave wants you to pay off all of your debt with the debt snowball. For those that are not familiar this is where he tells you to pay the minimum payments on all of your debt, and any extra money you earn or find gets applied to the debt with the lowest balance first. He claims that finance is 80% psychology, 20% money or something like that. Paying off a few small bills give you a psychological boost to tackle the big debt.
While that may be true, it is mathematically flawed and ends up costing you money. A simple example: you have two credit cards with balances of $1,000 and 3,000. Card A ($1,000) has an interest rate of 9.99% and Card B ($3,000) has an interest 23%. Dave wants me to keep paying 23% interest while I knock out the first card. That makes absolutely no sense and is costing me money along the way.
My second beef with Ramsey is that he wants you to do steps 5 and 6 before step 7. This isn’t a major concern of mine, but I don’t think children’s education should come before retirement. For some people, saving 15% will set them up for life when they retire. For others, not so much. You can’t borrow for your retirement. You can borrow for your kid’s education. Remember that.
The third concern I have with Ramsey is his anti-credit card stance. This is my largest issue with the Dave Ramsey system.
I understand that there are people out there in the world that simply cannot manage a credit card safely. For those folks, I have no problem saying you should use cash and debit cards for the rest of your life.
However, I don’t understand why Dave’s system starts with getting out of debt and stopping the use of credit, and ends with building wealth… but continues the theme of not using credit. If his system was there to truly rehabilitate people, he would train them how to safely use credit.
This may seem minor to some people. So you’re missing out on $400 of free money per year. Big whoop, I can deal with that. But there are many extra benefits to using credit cards and if the person following his system is truly following it to a T, then it applies just as well to credit cards as it does to cash and debit cards.
The bottom line for me is just because I have a credit card, I don’t have to use it to buy things on credit. Technically, yes, I do. But I have the money sitting in my bank account waiting to pay the bill. So use your credit card like a debit card or a wad of cash. It’s all the same. It’s a representation of money. Again, I’m not saying every person on his plan could handle it. Obviously many can’t in our country. However, I think one of the final steps should be to reintroduce people to credit in a safe manner.
There are so many benefits to credit cards it just seems silly. I’ve talked about them in the past. It helps automate our finances. I pay most of our normal bills with the credit card (electronically), and pay one bill to the credit card company (electronically) at the end of the month. I’m not sending ten envelopes with checks to various companies, trying to time them correctly so I don’t overdraw my checking account. I get security when I travel or buy things online. If my card is stolen, no big deal. American Express steps up to the plate and takes care of me. If I’m on my honeymoon in Mexico and someone steals all of my cash… well, that’s a different story.
Dave Ramsey is a Great Guy
Let me finish by saying I like Dave Ramsey. He’s a Christian influence in the personal finance world. He’s a huge Tennessee Vols fan. We have a lot in common. But I do think that his system — like any system! — has it’s flaws.
What do you think? Is Ramsey a nut case, financial genius, or something in between?
Get instant updates by subscribing to No Debt Plan: RSS or E-mail




65 Comments, Comment or Ping
Ashley @ Wide Open Wallet
I like his snowball method and think the benefits outweigh the poor math. The highest interest rate I have is on my mortgage (5.75%). I certainly don’t think I should try to pay off my mortgage before I pay extra on my cars. I would much rather pay off my cars asap to improve my cash flow.
of course, you have to do look at the situation as a whole, if you have a balance of $5,000 at 24% and a balance of $4,500 at 8% I think it’s pretty clear you should pay the larger balance first.
Jul 1st, 2008
Michael Smith
As far as the cashback incentives coming from people who are paying 24% interest on their outstanding balance: I use Discover card for most purchases and would gladly give up my 3-5% cashback incentive if it meant that everyone was managing their credit well. (I’m sure Kevin would agree since this blog exists to help people manage their finances better.) But everyone is not managing their credit well, so I would prefer to use a card where some of that extra interest goes back to cardholders instead of all of it padding the corporate bottom line.
Jul 1st, 2008
Kevin
@Ashley: I guess that is kind of my point. His system says “you must do this” rather than “think smart and make a good decision.” Granted, some people seem incapable of that…
@Michael: I want my cash back.
Show me the day that no one pays any interest to any credit card company and I’ll show you utopia. But! His point of 5% versus charging the vendor 3% and other “poor victims” paying the other 2% is incorrect as well.
For starters, the first $6,500 of my purchases earn 1.5% and 0.5% of cash back depending on the purchase. Those fees could come straight from the vendor I purchase my goods from and still leave money left over to start paying me when I reach the 5%/1.5% mark.
Secondly, once I hit that 5%/1.5% cash back mark, only gas, groceries, and drug store purchases are 5%. So there are a limited number of transactions that require “other victims” to finance the extra 2%. On top of that, every other purchase I make is only earning 1.5% cash back. If AMEX charged the vendor 3%, then that’s 1.5% that can be applied toward my 5% cash back.
Jul 1st, 2008
Jeff
I can agree with your 3rd issue. There is a time and place for using credit cards. The tool is not evil, using it poorly makes it seem that way.
Your 2nd issue is really a matter of priority. I think his step 4 is building retirement at a respectable pace and step 7 takes care of the rest. Step 5 builds your kids’ futures for them, and step 6 allows step 7 to move ahead quickly.
But I have to disagree with your beef with the debt snowball being a bad thing. It looks to me like you - a person in control of spending and debt - are not willing to accept that there is more to paying down debt that pure mathematics. Humans are creatures with emotion. Sometimes we need motivation. Another flaw in your thinking is that the folks that are buried in debt are obviously not comfortable with the pure math. They wouldn’t be in the predicament that they fell into if they understood that a $2000 TV costs $6000 after paying minimum payments for years.
Getting someone to change a major facet of their life requires some small wins to keep them in the longer game. The debt snowball gives them the chance at making those wins.
Jul 1st, 2008
Kevin
@Jeff: Thanks for commenting! I see what you are saying about 4-7. I can buy that, fair enough.
On the debt snowball, I’m not saying that there isn’t some psychology involved in paying off debt. But what if you’re in the situation Ashley described? $4,500 @ 8% and $5,000 at 24%? That seems pretty cut and dry to me — pay off the $5,000 first.
I guess I just don’t like how he draws a line in the sand. Either way, as long as people are paying off debt we’re making progress, right?
Jul 1st, 2008
Christine
I am a Dave Ramsey fan. I do agree with your opinion though. I think the reason why he “drew a line in the sand” is because there are people out there that are so over their heads… they just don’t know where to begin as far as paying off debt goes.
Its a great plan but I do agree with the logic of paying off the credit card with the higher interest rate first.
Jul 1st, 2008
Vinayak Kulkarni
Here is what I think you are missing the whole point of of DR’s process:
1. First, Dave wants you to pay off all of your debt with the debt snowball…. “Dave wants me to keep paying 23% interest while I knock out the first card. That makes absolutely no sense and is costing me money along the way.”
If you {any credit card borrower} were so math savvy you would not be borrowing on 9% or 23% interest in the first place. I believe this process is designed just to be a moral booster instead of saving money, which you already understood and quoted.
2. My second beef with Ramsey is that he wants you to do steps 5 and 6 before step 7
May be you are exception or part of a minority, may be you retire first before your kids go to college. But generally what I have seen (including myself, my friends and my neighborhood) people have their first kid when they are less than 30 years of age, so its quite logical to prioritize college funding first before planning for retirement. I agree with your point that you cannot borrow for retirement but you can for education. Heck going with the same thinking - why not settle for you kids flipping burger their whole life instead of saving for their expensive college education or putting your kids under debt when they have no income or no potential to earn any income.
I am not sure of you or others in general, but one of my goals in life is to see my kids get all the things in life that I couldn’t get or enjoy during my life time { be like those fancy shoes that my dad couldn’t afford when I was in school or the car I just wished I could have had during college but couldn’t afford or the medical school I couldn’t attend because I couldn’t afford }
Same principles for number 6 before 7 - he preaches a 15 year fixed mortgage which usually gets paid off well before you retire. So why wouldn’t you be happy with a paid off house that you could very well use as a money source during retirement?
The way I see this is - plan to shoo off your kids to college with enough money so that they won’t come back to your home and you live happily in a fully paid off home
3. The third concern I have with Ramsey is his anti-credit card stance. This is my largest issue with the Dave Ramsey system.
I am surprised why this is so difficult to understand. How is this different from the title of your website, may I quote “nodebtplan” ? Please remember this system is not for sane people who are able to manage their debt sincerely. Think of DR as the meeting organizer of your local AA chapter. For people who recognize themselves as Alcoholics “drinking in moderation” is not a solution. Being a teetotaler is the only answer.
These credit card companies of today are no different then the Marlboros of 1930s. Once you are sucked into revolving credit for many its very difficult to come out - The only solution is to pay them off and quit using them to avoid a relapse.
Your point of earning points/cash back is well and good only until you miss a payment; miss one payment and you are off begging to the credit card company to excuse you for being late {else all your 0% offers are due in full immediately}.
I am not denying that there is a potential to earn money off of credit cards and credit card offers { for dare devil examples go to the finance section of fatwallet.com and search for AOR } All it takes is one missed payment to crash your whole earnings plan. But this is like playing the casinos - the house always wins, may be you won’t lose with your hi-tech bill payment and sms account alerts but there are a large number of average people suckered into it.
There are some finer points of Credit cards like payment protection, charge back abilities, fraud liabilities protection which when used prudently will help you.
For the record:
* I am no way related to DR and don’t work for him in anyway.
* I have one credit card from each type {A/V/M/D}
* Don’t use cash or debitcard {except for cash withdrawal}
* Charge everything to my credit card.
* Earn cash back
* Charitable giving are more than than cash back earnings. So no guilt.
My passion for Dave Ramsey’s style stems from the success of his program, the joy of people getting out of debt and the proof from the radio and TV shows that his plan works so well.
Do something that touches and improves other people’s lives and prove that you can do it better than DR’s plan and may be then you have earned a right to call him wrong.
Jul 2nd, 2008
Debt Free Earth
Kevin,
I follow Dave Ramsey on the radio and on Fox Business and admire his work. While his math may not be perfect, it’s the “instant gratification” of paying off the first debt that keeps people going. In addition, once the priciple gets paid in large chunks, the difference in interest becomes considerably less anyway.
Like you however, I disagree with his baby steps and the order of them. I do agree with paying off debt, including the mortgage, as soon as possible before anything else. The amount of wealth that can be accumulated in a short time is staggering if you have no debt. Saving up for a kids college education won’t take long, if you are debt free (they should be helping to contribute too). And the 6-month emergency fund that might take 3-4 years to stockpile only takes 6 months when you are debt free. What if an emergency happens? Charge it, but work it back into your “debt snowball”. At this point, if the system is being worked properly, a person has the education and discipline to do this properly. In addition, the debt snowball is a built in emergency fund as it grows. If something happens, you might not be able to pay back debt that month, but can pay cash with that month’s snowball payment for that emergency.
As far as the regular credit card usage to get cash back, the problem is most people spend more when using credit cards (or even a debit card) because they don’t “feel the pain” that they would by using cash. Think about it, if someone wanted a new TV, would they walk into Best Buy with $1000 in cash to get that nice new Hi-def version? Probably not. They would think long and hard about it and either settle for a less pricey model or not buy it at all. But with a credit card, they can just swipe and go. Even on a smaller scale, people make these decisions every day. Can discipline be exercised? Of course, but the credit card companies are counting that it is not. And usually they are right.
Jul 2nd, 2008
Kevin
@Vinayak: We are on separate sides of the fence. You can say you are surprised why I don’t seem to be “getting it”, but I can say the exact same thing to you. Why don’t you “get it”?
You even admit you are an avid credit card user, so you obviously get it, but don’t seem to think other people that have been in debt before could ever understand how it works safely.
Yes, Ramsey is like the AA group leader. But he teaches people to fear credit. I don’t think teaching fear is the way to go. His system obviously works and he has pulled many people out from the debt pit. But at the same time, once they are out of debt, I think he should **extend** the plan to show them how to use credit responsibly.
It’s like saying going 80% of the way is “good enough” when you are leaving people open to frustration (try flying or renting a car with a debit card — yes, it can be done, but yes it is annoying compared to using a credit card), fraud (can I borrow your debit card and pin number, please? Or just your wallet full of cash?), and missing out on some free money (the rewards we have discussed).
So why go 80% of the way, when you could go all the way? Because it sells more books and brings in more devout followers? Ramsey isn’t known as the guy who teaches you how to responsibly spend and save money in our society. He’s the anti-credit, anti-debt guy. A slight change, but significant in my eyes. You don’t get to hear the stories of people who have had all of their money stolen due to fraud/burglary, or who have tried Ramsey’s system and it doesn’t work for them. Then again, if I was making millions off of my book program, I might not let others share that either.
Granted, I’m looking at this from the eyes of someone who manages and uses credit safely and always has. I’m not getting calls from collection agencies. I’m not under that stress. Yes, some people need a drastic change in their lives. But I’d like to think there is a light at the end of the tunnel where having a mortgage and using a credit card are acceptable and safe.
For those that are pitching the 15 year mortgage, I’d rather have a 30 year and plan to pay it off early. The payments are automatically higher on a 15 year, which might put you under more stress.
And a final note, last time I checked in the United States I didn’t have to “earn” my “right” to say someone was wrong. It’s called an opinion. And I’m sticking to it.
Jul 2nd, 2008
Livingalmostlarge
15 year mortgages are dumb. You should always get a 30 year mortgage and just pay it like a 15. When in trouble you can back up to the 30 year payment. NOT so with a 15 year. Until you own the house in full you don’t own it, the bank does.
So, prepaying a house is dumb. Don’t prepay the house, if you want to stick it into a money market savings account. Then pay it in full 100%. Again if anything happens like Ashley’s husband dies (god forbid), she owns 50% of the house, gee too bad if she only has her 6 month EF. They’ll boot her when the money runs out and if she can’t afford the house?? Oh well. You don’t own your house till you own it 100%. It can be taken away.
Third, dave ramsey preaches fear. Fear credit. Gotta agree because most of the people following him are so in over their heads that they wouldn’t have gotten there if they had a drop of common sense. But they don’t, so they should never use credit.
Jul 2nd, 2008
Laura
Actually, Baby Step #4 is retirement. #7 is building up your wealth (in addition to retirement). This wealth can be used for Charitable Giving, for example.
Jul 2nd, 2008
John
I agree with DR that it’s a good idea to cut up the credit cards if you have been a slave to debt in the past. The analogy to “AA” is good. If you are a recovering alcoholic you shouldn’t keep a bottle of vodka in the house. Same for someone with an irresponsible spending past and having a nice new credit card with zero balance. They shouldn’t have a credit card.
But I agree that responsible people who never run a balance should use the free money offered from cash back cards. I used my personal credit card for a lot of business travel and paying regular monthly bills. In 3 years, I got over $2000 in free money from credit card rebates.
Other than the credit card issue and order of snowballing (you should pay the highest % first), I think his overall plan is good. More people than not will benefit.
Jul 11th, 2008
JoeTaxpayer
I think the note you got was on target.
You see, I agree with your approach 100%. Dave’s order is wrong for you and me, and anyone who is reasonably good with money. In fact, one can load up on available credit, and instead of having any emergency account, put all their money into their retirement account. When I had a true emergency, I was able to borrow from my 401(k) and pay it back over a year’s time. Same with the 0% CC offers, I’ve done them a few times to pocket nearly $3,000 total. My regular card gives me 2% back into a college (529) account.
But most people aren’t as sophisticated as you or me, and need Dave’s simple approach to get out of their mess. That’s too bad.
Joe
Jul 12th, 2008
Dave
I may not be as “anti-credit card” as Dave Ramsey but I think you are probably better off in today’s day and age avoiding using them, simply because the credit card companies have become predatory over the last 10 to 15 years.
When my wife and I were first married (mid-80s), credit cards came from your local bank after you filled out an application and they reviewed and checked it (if you really had your act together, you may get an American Express card that required full payment each month). If you tried to charge something over your credit limit, they declined the charge, today they approve it and add a $39 over-the-limit “fee”. A day late paying? — $39 late “fee”.
Not to mention this whole concept of penalty interest rates and the recent example of Bank of America unilaterally raising rates on folks that *did* pay according to their agreement with the bank.
Credit cards are a financial tool, but using them improperly in today’s environment can cause you tremendous problems, much better off using debit cards - its paid immediately and you don’t have to think about it any more.
Aug 8th, 2008
Kevin
@Dave: I agree to disagree.
Yes, there are fees if you misuse a credit card. However, it is all in the fine print. Read the fine print, don’t over-charge, and pay on time. End of all of the problems you mention. For overcharging, unless you’ve already misused credit in the past you shouldn’t have much of a problem getting a huge credit line — our current line on an AMEX is 50% of my base salary (not that we would ever use it).
The BoA is not indicative of all credit card companies, at least to my knowledge.
I’ve stated time and time again that credit cards trump debit cards in almost every situation. In most instances where you compare, the credit card can give more protection that debit cards. The only instance where it doesn’t is overspending. And that isn’t the credit card’s problem. That’s the person’s spending problem.
Aug 9th, 2008
Sam
I do agree that credit card per-se is evil and should be avoided. I believe its neither good nor evil. It all depends on how people use it.
As with Dave’s avoidance of credit card, you have check the kind of people he’s trying to help. Most of the people he dealt with have huge credit card debts. By trying to tell them to get rid of credit card, he’s probably helping them avoid stepping into their “old” temptation of bad credit card usage.
But I agree with you, maybe Dave can include in his steps how to use credit card effectively instead of avoiding them.
Sam
Fix My Personal Finance
http://fixmypersonalfinance.com/
Aug 13th, 2008
The Happy Rock
I am not into arguing Dave’s right or he is wrong, I don’t really think it serves to much purpose and would rather see people put their energy to better use like destroying debt.
With that said, I think Dave Ramsey has a great plan. Personal finances are about behavior. His whole system is designed to change behavior and pave your financial future so that you can be free to use your money, energy, and time in positive ways. If you follow his advice to the letter, you will do well no questions asked. It works for the masses and is designed to reach the masses. The more radical you are the more your financial future changes. A couple of dollars in interest or credit card rewards even hundreds are insignificant in the big picture in my opinion. It is about changing your life and your mindset so that you don’t have worry about the little things and are free to focus or things that are much more important than money.
Can any system be 100% right when finances are personal? I think a plan can not be right 100% of the time and still achieve its goal 100% of the time.
Aug 17th, 2008
Ginger
I think your views on Dave Ramsey are a bit short sighted. There are segments of our population who need not look at a credit card. Period. Why? Because they can’t handle the responsibility. They have lived their lives using credit cards for the most basic of necessities with little consideration as to how the bill will be paid off.
The overall benefits to his babysteps outweigh the math.
Also, who says that one must follow the baby steps in the order that he prescribes? If you can read and have an insightful approach to your finances and able to compute the math, you’ll be fine.
I think hte bottom line is this, we have to be responsible with what we promote and yes his math is wrong, but overall the guy has a really good system that’s gotten most people out of debt and I cant knock him for that.
Psychology is a big part of it so getting caught up in the math makes no sense to me.
Aug 17th, 2008
Kevin
@The Happy Rock: Excellent point. Thanks for the comment.
I still think he should include safe credit card use if not for the cash back reward possibilities, but for the simple fact that they can be beneficial in certain situations.
Aug 17th, 2008
Kevin
@Ginger:
To your points:
1. Did I not write this at the beginning of the credit card section? “I understand that there are people out there in the world that simply cannot manage a credit card safely. For those folks, I have no problem saying you should use cash and debit cards for the rest of your life.”
So yes, there are people that simply shouldn’t use credit.
2. What if you followed the baby steps but adapted to the math? Then you get the benefit of both.
3. I also said at the end I like Ramsey. But like any plan, it does have its flaws.
4. Okay. The psychology dart people throw. I love it. If it’s all about the psychology… then why not look at it like you would a victim of some other crime? If someone is deathly afraid of credit, why not rectify that? It’s like not letting an alcoholic go to AA meetings.
Why leave folks afraid of credit when it has it’s place in the world? Why not make the last step “re-learning how to safely use credit”?
In that vein, I think Ramsey’s plan is short sighted. Credit isn’t going anywhere. It isn’t evil. Misusing is the person’s fault. Let’s train them how to use it.
Seriously, does Ramsey think everyone can pay cash for their next home? No? Then they’re going to use credit at some point. Even using a credit card for $100 per month and paying it off each month would help build their credit profile.
I agree to disagree.
Aug 17th, 2008
Ginger
I never said the plan was perfect, but I think posts like these only serve to sway others looking for something that may actually work for them in the wrong direction.
Yes, credit is evil to those who cannot manage it and thus Ramsey does not recommend usage for anyone who isnt able to manage or handle the responsibility.
There are people such as NCN who do NOT use credit and live just fine. So there are actually people who live off the credit grid and are just as OK. I dont have a preference for either but I think your post was shirt sighted in this aspect.
And what psychology dart do you speak of? Did you not understand what I wrote do you felt the need to throw that in there? If you dont understand it, say that but what is there to love when you lackk understanding of this aspect?
I know many people who paid cash for their homes. If Jonathan from Mymoneyblog didnt live in CA, the he could have bought 1-4 homes depending if he lived in a lower cost of living area.
You dont have to go point by point, you don’t know it all lol I am making comments based on my understandings and observations on your post, please spare me the attitude in your response, I don’t need it. It wouldnt kill you to tone the base in your response, just a little bit.
Please and thank you.
Aug 17th, 2008
Pete
Couple of points, you talked about saving for kids college coming before retirement. Actually in Ramsey’s plan you do retirement first, and then for kids college. So your retirement DOES come first. The step seven is just building more wealth and giving to others - not necessarily saving for retirement.
As far as the debt snowball part, i understand how the math isn’t always 100% the best, but even Ramsey himself says exactly that. But a lot of personal finance is about psychology, and what way is the most effective at getting you out of debt, and keeping you out of debt. The debt snowball is a great way to do that because it takes into account the emotional part of debt reduction. Again, as the happy rock said above, personal finance IS personal, so if you have two debts, one larger with a higher interest, you may want to pay that off first. It is your personal choice. It just happens though that a lot of people have more success using the debt snowball because the cumulative effects of paying of a bunch of small debts in succession keep them motivated to keep going and pay off the rest.
I had an audio post from dave ramsey’s show recently talking about why the debt snoball works HERE
As far as credit cards and responsible use there-of - i think it is possible for some people to have and use credit responsibly, and others should cut up their cards and never get another one. The people that Ramsey’s program is geared towards probably should not be using credit - and I think his leaving responsible use of credit out of the program is a wise idea. Kind of like teaching an alcoholic responsible ways of drinking
For me I keep one rewards credit card that I use rarely, and ALWAYS pay off right away. For other stuff we keep an emergency fund and 3-6 months of expense.
Great post to get the discussion going!
Aug 20th, 2008
Deb
The problem with no credit card in your name is that if your car dies and you have to get to work without public transportation you cannot rent a car from anybody so you lose a day’s work. Not a good option. The other issue, which won’t apply to everyone, is distant child or parents get sick or die and you can’t buy an airline ticket quickly to rush to the bedside. Cash is nice to have on hand to cover it when you get back but you need the ticket today.
We agreed to pay for private high school but it was clear to the children that it meant they paid for college; and they did and all except the youngest (who just graduated) are free of college debt (and he will be very soon).
Excellent topic even if I have no clue who Dave Ramsey is; but it seems I disagree with his sticking points. Oh well.
Aug 21st, 2008
Kevin
@Deb: Thanks for the comment. I completely agree. I used to work for a rental car company. Credit card… much easier.
@Pete: You are right. It is personal and people can make their own choices.
I don’t buy the psychology bit. Well, I buy part of it — people do things they know they shouldn’t. But I think if he is going to claim psychology as a defense for his incorrect math, then I think it should be used to properly correct behavior and teach people how to use credit (rather than fear it).
Aug 21st, 2008
Pete
I wouldn’t have bought the part about the psychology of it either if i hadn’t witnessed it first hand in our financial peace university class. Using the debt snowball people who had never been able to get out of debt before (and who DID understand that it is mathematically better to pay the highest interest first) were finally able to make a dent in their debt, and during the class (6 couples) the group paid off a combined 50,000 in 3 months.
The debt snowball works - but like dave ramsey said in the audio clip on my site - “you can’t go wrong getting out of debt”. So however you want to do it - go for it!
Again as far as the credit - i don’t think he includes anything about that because it’s a slippery slope to begin teaching about the “proper use of credit” when most of the people he’s teaching to probably shouldn’t be using credit. His whole philosophy is to get away from the place where you NEED to use credit. I don’t think it’d be particularly helpful for him to be teaching about that.
Aug 21st, 2008
Mr. NtJS
Kevin,
First, I want to thank you for not going totally negative here as so many like to when it comes to Ramsey. He does have a fabulous system that has help an unbelievable amount of people. We should be so luck as to have that kind of positive impact.
Now on your sticking points:
1. the debt snowball. No offense, but its usually the people who haven’t been through the plan that discount the psychological wins of his ’smallest to largest’ snowball. As he points out, over and over, this method is preferred because, in his experience of teaching and financial counseling for nearly two decades, people actually stick with it. At this point it’s not about math. 80% behavior, 20% head knowledge. If card B were a $10,000 balance, would you still put it before card A? I doubt it. Besides, if interest rate is your hang up, then surf the balance. Even Dave will tell you to do that! Just don’t pretend that you’ve made some big accomplishment - the debt is still there.
2. You seem to be confused here, because it’s step 4 when you take care of retirement. Once again, Dave will agree that college funding should not come before retirement, because kids can work there way through college. Other than that, putting 7 before 5&6 makes no sense. You would build up a bunch of wealth and investments before starting a college fund or paying off your house? Besides, college funding isn’t forever, and once done, you can kick more into retirement if you’d like.
3. I hate to tell you this, but Dave’s target audience is all of America, not some lower-class people as some seem to be suggesting. There are people using his program that make $200k per year. Doctors, engineers, pharmacists. Just the same as there are single moms making $20k per year. Paying off a card does not make you elite. The Mrs. carried a card for 8 years, and never once carried a balance on it. Yet she put it in the shredder just the same. Why? Well, why do business someone you don’t trust? It’s like mail-in-rebates. Sure, maybe you’ve always gotten yours back and you think they are just fine. I bought a $70 router for $7 once. I waited 6 weeks for the first check of $30, and another 4-6 weeks for the other check. But we’ve also been burned big-time by rebates that never came through. It’s a system and a game that you are not intended to win. Just like credit cards. you aren’t intended to win that game either, and even if you follow all the rules and be ‘responsible’, they can still change the rules mid-game. Move your billing date up. Misplace your payment. Do whatever they want. As a matter of principle, why do business with a company that you don’t respect and is out to get you?
I would challenge you, as I have others, to dive a bit deeper than some topical info on Dave’s website. Listen to his podcast for a week, a month. You’ll find he’s more on -target than you think.
Oh,and BTW - do you really think that Dave - or anyone else for that matter - can’t get a rental car when traveling because of not having a credit card? Please. Only, two companies won’t take debit and they are too expensive anyways. Non-issue.
Aug 29th, 2008
Kevin
Not the Jet Set: Thanks for commenting. To your points:
1. I don’t buy the psychological argument. Again, I’m not saying his system hasn’t worked — not at all. I’m saying it could be better. And if he wants take the psychological argument then he should also accept that if his audience can’t handle credit… teaching them to fear it isn’t the best psychological move is it? At the end of the day if you can use a debit card you can use a credit card. But the fear teaching of his program doesn’t work for me. Why not continue to use the psychology to help the “victims” of credit?
And if the other card had $10,000 I would still go after the high interest card. As I pay the card down, I’m saving money compared over the other card, plus my interest payments for that card are going down.
2. I’ll give you that point.
3. You can’t make a blanket statement that all credit card companies are going to change the rules on you. Perhaps some will, especially the bad ones, but I’ve had credit cards for many years and never experienced anything you mention here. Again, I’m not saying it doesn’t happen. But I also don’t believe it always happens. There’s a difference there. It’s also really hard to misplace your payment when it is done electronically. Even if that happens, it takes one call to customer service for me to fix just about any issue.
Again this goes back to the psychology issue. Don’t do business with a company you don’t respect and is out to get you. That’s fear. Ramsey is teaching you to fear the company rather than to stand up for yourself as a customer.
4. You assume I haven’t listened to his podcast. I did, for about a month, at work. I was saddened by the stories of people who called in. And Ramsey really knew his stuff on things I was ignorant on — the particulars of bankruptcy or odd real estate deals for example. So he is definitely intelligent. But other than those calls, I heard primarily this: “I’m in debt with $X owed here and $X owed there.” Ramsey’s response is always to get their income, tell them to cut their spending and start paying off the debt. Okay, that works (other than the details we’ve discussed). But the show was very repetitive and kind of boring after a while.
5. I can pretty much guarantee you — because I used to work for the world’s largest rental car company — that if John Doe walks in with cash, is it going to be very difficult for him to get a rental car.
“But he also says debit cards are okay” — ah, but he’s also all about cash, too. Right? If you went Ramsey crazy and just used cash it would near impossible to get a rental car — unless you put down a large amount of cushion money.
“So just use a debit card.” Okay — if you use your credit card like a debit card, what’s the difference? You get to hold onto your money now? Thieves can’t empty your bank account? If you use a debit card they are going to take the cost of the rental plus (normally) a $150 to $200 deposit. More of your money out of the account.
That is my point. If you wrote debit card on your credit card and used it like a debit card there would be no negative difference, only a positive difference. And Ramsey’s fans usually don’t see that because they’ve been taught to fear credit. And that’s what I disagree with.
Aug 29th, 2008
NtJS
Wow. So you’ve listened to his show, but you just aren’t hearing him.
1. It’s good that you don’t buy into fear teaching, because Dave does not teach fear. It just isn’t there. I’m not sure where that is coming from. I’ve read his books. Listened to his show. Even taught his class. It’s just not there. It’s empowerment. It’s taking control and not letting credit cards, and collectors, credit scores rule your life. There is a big difference there.
Once again, you discount the psychological, but you have not done it. Right? Having done this, I can tell you that starting out trying to knockout a $10k debt first, when the snowball (payment) is smallest, would have felt near insurmountable.
2. This is where I assumed you hadn’t listened to Dave. Lots of bloggers like to grab a couple tidbits here and there and think that they know all about him and his plan.
3. No, I can’t say all credit card companies are going to abuse their customers as some have quite notably done. But can you say which ones won’t? How about which ones will? Get out your crystal ball… Here is the blanket statement that I can tell you. They all have the right to. “….all terms subject to change at any time, for any reason, without prior notification….” This industry is constantly moving, and the cardholder agreement allows for it. Universal default, double-cycle billing, moving due dates, jacking interest rates, rewards falling off before you can use them. What’s next? They could take away the grace period and start charging interest immediately if they wanted to.
“Don’t do business with a company you don’t respect and is out to get you.” That is not fear. But it is not fear. It’s power. It’s taking control of my financial destiny and not letting it hinge on the whims of a credit card company.
4. The depth of his financial knowledge is rather mind blowing at times. Again, a lot is, fortunately or unfortunately, from experience. And while the show can get repetitive at times, I find that I am constantly learning things from him and his callers. The repetition tells you how large some of these problems are in our country. One thing I hear repeated a lot is how credit card companies and their collections abuse customers and break federal law. Once again - this is *not* teaching fear. If Dave were teaching fear, he would be saying, ” yeah, the collector is right. They are going to come and get you and throw you in jail and your kids will go into foster care! you better pay him first.” Quite the contrary. He specifically teaches NOT to make decisions based on fear, as well as giving people the psychological boost and the financial tools to get out of debt and get the scum bags out of their lives. Empowerment.
5. Well, yeah, it probably is difficult renting a car with cash. I do know a couple that will do it, and no, they aren’t the biggest ones out there. But I’m not sure who is suggesting doing that. Dave isn’t. I’m not. Once again, I don’t think you’re grasping his message.
6. No, there IS a difference between credit and debit no matter how you use them. Risk. Oft negated, ever present. When I pay with debit, it’s done. Paid. When you pay with credit, it’s not done. You then, sometime in the future, have to pay the credit card bill. And a lot can happen between now and then. Unnecessary, unneeded risk. And they can’t pay me off with rewards to forget about the risk.
Aug 29th, 2008
Anitraclark
I am a Dave fan so I have nothing to say other than Go Dave!
great blog!
Sep 3rd, 2008
Kevin
Loving this discussion
1. It is a form of fear. Empowerment of the fear of credit cards. The “I shouldn’t use credit because if I do then I will be back in debt again because I don’t know how to use credit”. That’s fear to me. It isn’t Ramsey running around with a Scream mask on with a knife kind of fear. It is subtle. I think we can just agree to disagree here.
3. Re: credit card companies — then do you research and find a good one. In one of my first posts ever (”Credit cards are not evil”) I liken credit cards to guns. They are a tool. A potentially dangerous tool like a gun or an axe. Both can be useful. Both can be deadly. Learning how to use them is my preferred method. (Let me point out I am deathly afraid of guns and don’t own one, so I’m not saying there isn’t a choice involved… but that’s getting off of the analogy.)
4. I agree on the collections part, but collections agencies are not credit card companies. If you don’t pay your debt, it gets bought by a collections agency. That’s pretty much how it works. You don’t pay the debt, they have every right to try and get payment (within the law of course). The credit card companies, at least to my knowledge, can’t control the collections agencies. People shouldn’t let their accounts go to collections in the first place, but I suppose that is a moot point.
6. What unnecessary, unneeded risk?
Steps:
1. get credit card with reasonable limit
2. setup automatic direct payment
3. buy stuff, deduct from your check book/budget spreadsheet as you would with a debit card or cash
4. bill is automatically paid, no interest earned
I suppose the “risk” is suddenly you have a need for that money sitting in the account — or perceive a need, or heck just spend it anyways — but that is a self control issue or emergency fund issue. I spend $100 on credit. I line up a $100 payment online (automatically). What is the risk? That the payment won’t go through? Call customer service.
Let me point out that if you are in debt, especially credit card debt, then you shouldn’t be using the same credit card that you hold debt on. That’s just silly, because then you’re paying interest on the whole balance. I can see why going to straight cash for that time period might be useful. My point is that there is a safe, reliable, rewarding way to use credit cards.
You think I don’t get Ramsey’s teachings and I think you don’t get that credit cards can be used just like debit cards. Fair enough.
Sep 3rd, 2008
NtJS
1. Empowerment of fear? That’s a new one. What you seem to be talking about is a healthy fear. There is a big difference between fear mongering and having a healthy fear. You want to liken credit cards to guns, ok. Both things that are reasonable to have a healthy fear of. So where is the problem?
3. This is awesome. We also have a post about why credit cards aren’t evil, but I’m betting that we took a little different approach to it than you did. My preferred method is not to do business with scum.
4. Absolutely false. Don’t think for a second that some of those collection agencies aren’t ‘first party’… because they are. Most, if not all of the major card issuers not only have their internal, branded collections departments, but also own outside collections companies under different names that they can hide behind while the immature idiots on the phones break federal law. Beyond all of that, owned or not, the fact that they do business with such scum says a lot about the companies.
6. What risk? Really. They guy who just likened credit cards to guns (and also illustrated a very on-topic, on-analogy fear of guns), is going to try to tell me that there are no risks involved. Really? Either your analogy stinks (I think it’s dead-on), you’re being facetious (possible), or you really, honestly believe that there are no risks (Hopefully not). Every sharpshooter (likely the best people in the world handling a gun) knows and understands every risk involved in handling, drawing and firing the weapon. If not, then they likely aren’t a sharpshooter for long. Sure, they can take every precaution to mitigate those risks, and it is possible to do - many are very good at it. All of those efforts are taxing to the individual, though. To take those risks for granted is a huge mistake, and can be absolutely devastating.
The risk here is life. It’s everything that can happen between now and payday. Charging up that card (within your means or not), and assuming that everything will be fine later is a multi-layered risk. It works great in the best-case scenario. Every cog in that machine to pay what once was a simple bill, is a risk. Now to compound that risk, is the number of cogs that are out of your control. The direct deposit paycheck being wrong or late, the auto-bill-pay system taking on a virus, the doufus at the store that charged you twice, the card issuer changing the rules midstream, the doufus CSR at the card company that claims to have fixed the problem, but doesn’t. This is not some perfect machine that always works without fail, and all of those things happen and more. Internet connections go down. Software has bugs, some associates are doufus’s, some CSRs are doufus’s, credit card companies have a very real interest in you NOT paying the bill. So establishing and engaging in this system is a better plan? No way.
I’m sure that if you worked really hard at it, you could use a credit card like a debit card. But why bother? That role has already been cast, and it’s called a debit card. Above you have steps 1-4 of hassle. All unnecessary and unneeded. Step 0: Pay with debit card or cash. DONE. There is no step 1, 2, 3, or 4. You can have your complicated way of paying for purchases, and I KNOW that you don’t get Ramsey.
Sep 5th, 2008
LivingAlmostLarge
I have issues with Dave Ramsey about his plan. But heck modify it.
First $1k isn’t going to cover a rent payment where I live, so the BEF needs to be larger. But that’s a point which should read “make it appropriate to situation”. If you have a mortgage of $2k, um, a $1k BEF is not going to work.
Second, debt payoff sure if it works for you great. Problem Kevin is these people are seriously bad with math. They have no idea how to balance a check book, etc. They are probably dealing with late fees, overdraft, etc. They need to keep it simple stupid or KISS. So it works.
Third, is lack of advice he gives post BS2. He should be saying that people need to save for car replacement, home repairs, etc. It’s not to come out of you FEFF. Why? Because when you really need the FEFF for death, disability, and loss of job, it won’t be there if you KEEP tapping it for every little “Emergency”. And that is a problem I see, people keep living with “emergencies” and never learn to get ahead. To get ahead you have to PLAN!
Fourth, 15% is enough if you are in your 20s or have a pension. It’s not enough if you are 30s or 40s and have 0 saved. So again stupid people follow this rule and they won’t have enough. Sigh.
Why sigh? There are no loans for retirement and ZERO should be saved for college ahead of retirement.
Also why would you not maximize retirement savings before paying off the mortgage? Unless you make $250k, 15% is not the maximum you can save.
So my other issue with Dave Ramsey is not maximizing retirement savings before paying off the mortgage. I don’t argue mortgage interest or the tax break, NOPE, my argument is you are saving 25% taxes on the income you stuff into a 401k! So that 25% outweighs your 6% mortgage.
So right there you have outearned your 6% mortgage, not counting the tax break which makes the interest rate on your mortgage actually 4.5%.
But if you aren’t maximizing your retirement accounts you are losing money on the math.
Sep 8th, 2008
Kimberly
I completely agree with you on his anti-credit stance.
I don’t like using cash or debit cards, and I’ve earned well over a hundred dollars in cash back in the last couple of months. And yes, I pay it off every month.
I think Dave Ramsey should encourage people to modify his plans if it fits their own situation better, but then again I understand that people climbing out of debt should maybe avoid the credit cards.
Sep 9th, 2008
Kevin
@NTJS: Sorry it’s been a while since I’ve responded. Been quite busy.
Again, to point 1: Healthy fear is not what I see from Ramsey. Every time someone calls into his show saying “I’ve never, even had a problem with credit cards” he berates them as he would a child and tells his listeners to never use credit. People use guns responsibly. People use credit cards responsibly. Ramsey says to never use credit.
4: agree to disagree. Wouldn’t be a problem if people used the cards correctly. You still have to pay. Ramsey has great tips for dealing with illegal methods, I’ll give him that.
6: You sound like the most risk averse person on the planet. You also make the credit card system sound like something that is held together by string and duct tape.
–the direct deposit could not go in: that’s why you don’t live paycheck to paycheck. You should have money in your account on the very rare instance that this occurs. I have recommended a one-month expense buffer in checking accounts in the past, essentially eliminating this risk. How many times have you experienced this? How long did you have to wait to get paid?
–the auto-billpay system gets a virus: please tell me this isn’t a serious argument. How many times have you even heard of this happening? If it is on the company’s side, a simple call to that CSR would fix any charges.
–the doufus at the store charges you twice: again, either call the store or call the card company. How is this different than using a debit card? With a debit card, it’s your actual money they are taking out of the account. Not so with credit.
–card issuer changes the rules midstream: what rules? When the payment is? If my due date ever changed, my automatic bill pay pays on the day the bill is due. If it moved, the payment would move.
–the CSR doesn’t fix things: document who you talk to, escalate the call, or call Executive Customer Service. There has to be a problem in the first place, and I think some of your issues are a bit of a stretch.
There is no work to using a credit card like a debit card. It works the same way if you have a budget. Swipe card. Go home, check to see charge went through. Deduct amount from budget category. Very simple.
Why? We’re beating a dead horse here. It is actually safer (when done correctly), plus added benefits of cash back and warranty extensions.
@Everyone else: Thanks for the comments!
Sep 14th, 2008
NtJS
1. Not sure what show you are listening to. I’ve listened to his show a lot over the past 4 years - used to listen everyday. I’ve never heard him berate anyone or treat them like a child. That’s not his show. Dave is incredibly respectful. I also don’t hear people calling in to say “I’ve never, even had a problem with credit cards”. I just don’t. Anyone calling in just to say that is likely being passive aggressive anyways. Are you sure you are talking about the Dave Ramsey Show?
6. No. I’ve just seen and heard life happen a lot, and I don’t pretend that risk doesn’t exist. And it’s not that the credit card system is a cobbled together system. The system you have described is. You transferred all of the risk and work from the bank to you. You really have. Debit does all that for you. And just in an effort to get rewards (which you can now get with debit cards) and extended warranties (which Consumer Reports and every other reputable consumer advocate says are worthless).
Anyways, I’ve made my points. In the end, I really don’t care if you use a credit card. You’re going to do what you’re going to do, as will I. We don’t need to try to convince each other otherwise. What you are doing can be done. It is a slippery slope, it does involve added risk, and as statistics show, very few are effectively pulling it off.
enjoyed the debate
cheers
Sep 15th, 2008
GHolmes
Enjoyed your article on attentive spending. Debt snowball worked for me. As I gained momentum I was able to negotiate my higher rate cards down. Took us only 18 months to get rid of 30k in debt. Have been 2+ years not using/owning a credit card and I do travel for business. Each PF guru has their own financial diet plan and if you choose to follow a particular diet stick to it. By sticking to it you will make it. Too bad Dave Ramsey is a Tennessee Vol Fan or he be all right!
Sep 17th, 2008
Troy
NTJS
Couldn’t agree with you more. There are very few people who get it. you are one of them.
RISK is what he discusses. That is the difference between CC and debit cards. Great job of pointing out the risks. Risk matters.
Kevin, if you are getting an MBA, which I have as well, then you are versed in risk assesment, or Beta.
Beta must be factored when assessing cost benefit. We could go into detail about this, or you can just take my following words.
Credit Cards exist for solely one reason. PROFIT. Not convienence, points, fraud protection, etc. Those are benefits, not purpose. The purpose is profit for the issuer. That means that a majority of users must result in a profit for the issuer, and a cost for the user.
Obviosly you already know this. that is why there are rewards and benefits, etc. It is redistribution. Most people pay, so a few can benefit, yet most thinnk they are or will be the ones who benefit, but of course the economic model will not support that.
CC are tools, just not for the user. they are tools for the issuer, and they are unnecessary. You can accomplish the exact same thing, with the same benifits, convienence, fraud protections with a debit card, so the only reason for CC is credit, and the incorrect assumption that using one is in your benefit because you can “beat” the system.
The issuer set up the system. It is their rules. Their money. their card with their name on it. They have the control, not you. They just let you think you do.
Love your site, by the way. I am all for no debt.
Sep 17th, 2008
Kevin
@GHolmes: as I’ve said to the nay-sayers that comment on this post, I’m NOT saying Ramsey is a bad guy. His plan works. Many plans work. I just disagree with his credit stance.
I appreciate you willingness to disagree in a civil manner.
@NTJS: I really don’t understand what work I am doing on behalf of the bank. I’m setting up an automatic payment, once. The payment goes through. Phew. That was tough.
I track my spending just like I would with any other form of payment (cash, debit, or credit). Phew. Not extra work.
Show me a debit card that earns 1.5-5% cash back plus allows me to earn 3% interest on the money as it sits in my bank account for the rest of the statement month and I’ll show you that it’s a credit card.
About the warranties, the warranty extension that comes with American Express works. I’ve not had the privilege to use it yet (thank goodness), but I’ve talked with others that have used it. All it does is add an extra year to the manufacturer’s warranty. I’m sure you have to have documentation like a receipt or order form, but for any large purchase that I would want to make sure I had a warranty I would do this regardless.
I think it could include added risk if you don’t pay attention to what you’re doing. Again, I’ve said for the folks that can’t handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen. That’s fine.
Again, enjoyed the civil debate.
@Troy: I understand risk.
Obviously credit cards exist for profit. I don’t believe I’ve claimed they aren’t designed for profit for the issuer. The issuer is a business. It isn’t shocking that they are attempting to earn a profit. If they didn’t, they would be a 403b non-profit, right?
The assumption that is a cost to the user is incorrect. Primarily the cost is for the merchant. I’ve explained this on the blog in the past. I’ll actually write a post about this for tomorrow morning.
In regards to them being the same with debit cards in terms of benefits, convenience, and fraud protection… I also disagree with that. Benefits is generic, but the cash back programs I have seen for the limited number of debit cards that offer it aren’t near what credit offers. Also, I get to float my purchases in my checking or savings account until the end of the statement month and earn interest on that money. With a debit card the money is taken out immediately and I lose the ability to earn interest on that money.
For convenience, swiping the card is convenience regardless of debit/credit. I’ll give you that.
Fraud protection I have thankfully not had to use, but I have a friend whose debit card number was stolen. $3,000 was taken from his account and it took a couple of weeks to get the full amount of the money back. That’s a long time to go without $3,000. (This was with a large bank, too.) With a credit card if my card or number is stolen and fraudulent charges are put on it, I place one call and don’t pay anything until the investigation is over. Result? I keep my $3,000 until proven “guilty” if you will.
So no, I disagree. Debit is not equal to credit. I think debit is inferior to credit because of the fraud issue.
Sep 17th, 2008
Troy
Kevin:
Of course there is a cost to the average user. The cost is interest. There must be a cost, or there would be no profit and CC would not exist.
Regarding your use of arbitrage, why stop the float at all. If you earn interest on the float and find benefit, why pay the balance off at all? Why not transfer the balance to another CC and continue this process in perpetuity?
See, I have heard virtually every reason why people use credit cards. Float, leverage, convienence, credit,rewards,points, protection, status, comfort, security, etc.
Every single reason except credit is flawed. It is a fact that the fraud protections for both major CC issuers are identical to that of their CC.
In addition, most major banks treat their debit cards with the same protections as their CC, so your reasoning of fraud is more of inconvience than protection. however, most are also more likely to catch fraud earlier with a debit card than a credit card.
Credit cards are debt. it maybe short term, it may be for just a few days, but it is still debt. Why would anyone go into debt for groceries,gas, etc if they have the money. It really makes no sense to me.
I have heard the argument for float several times. That argument matches yours in that you would rather earn interest on your money during the grace period. OK. First, that amount of interest is minimal. Second, as I stated earlier, if that is truly a reason, then the same principal applies to a perpetual float amongst several cards until the limit is maxed. Yet every proponent of Credit cards and the float says in the same sentence that they “pay their cards off every month”.
There are risks, and I know you understand them. Many people don’t, however. I know of no one that got into credit card debt on purpose. I know of no one whose aim was to bury themselves in debt. But it happens. Smart people get in CC debt every day. They think they can beat the system,and then life happens, as NTJS stated.
Risk from things that are out of your control, and risks from things that are. When you say NTJS must be the most risk averse person on the planet,I think you are missing his and my point. It is not that all of those things might happen,it is that one of those things will happen. It is one of those things has happened.
Rewards…they are carrots. I ask myself why are they so eager to give you rewards. We all know the answer.
Using a credit card is like gambling. A few people win, and those few create the illusion that more are likely to win, but most people don’t. Only the house consistently wins.
You maybe able to continue to “beat” the system but over 60% of the people who use cards don’t.
I enjoyed the debate,and I wish you luck with debt and with school
Sep 17th, 2008
GHolmes
The cost for these tricks the bank offers us do get past on to us the consumer. The merchant pays, yes but why dont you think it doesnt get past on to the consumer? You do pay for the convenience of the banks and so do I. The sign in the independently owned corner market read “no credit card or debit card purchases under $5.00″. Trickle down economics. Go BEAVS!
Sep 18th, 2008
Chima
I enjoy Dave Ramsey’s radio program, and listening to the callers who call in to let him know they are debt-free continues to keep me focused and motivated on ridding myself of my debts. I do agree however that no system is perfect, and I’ve never had the feeling that Ramsey thinks his system is perfect either. He strikes me as a humble man who is out to help others out of their tough situations. As for his baby steps, I thinks the steps are fine, however I chose to build up MY emergency fund/6months of expenses ($12,000) all at once before going to Step 2. I’m on track to complete Step 1 on Feb 28th, 2009! The funny thing is that in mid-March of this year, my wife and I had exactly $132 in the savings account, and now we’re 4 months removed from hitting the unreal amount of $12,000!
Sep 18th, 2008
FLNonny
Dave is statistally CORRECT. It is a proven fact that those who use a credit card spend 12%-18% MORE than if they had to pull out cash or a debit card. It’s precisely why McDonald’s put in their credit card machines after years of studying market spending.
Spending is more behavioral/psychological than anything else. More people spend out of desire and compulsion than need. We NEVER acquire debt because we don’t use credit (we paid off $18,000 this past year) and we now have just our small house pmt of $800 each month on a $94,000 one-person salary. There are some, like my 83-yr-old mother, who CAN use a credit card wisely; she has always paid hers off EACH month, but she will also tell you that she spends more than she would if she had to pull out the cash for each transaction. Since she is not short on cash (and she has not had debt since she was first married in 1955), she can “afford” to waste money. Most of us are NOT in that same situation and some of us (me included) no longer want to waste money. I’d rather take the excess and donate it to charitable causes we find important or save it for a future car for our future college student. In January 2009 we will be Dave Ramsey church facilitators and we already love the program. Dave has a proven track record. If you haven’t gone thru his class or read ALL his books, it’s easy to dismiss his program. Check your local library for his books/tapes; it’s free and easy (can’t beat that!).
Sep 19th, 2008
Clair Schwan of Frugal Living Freedom
It seems that it doesn’t matter much whether anyone agrees or disagrees with Dave Ramsey. What matters is whether he can contribute “a gem” to our pool of knowledge, and cause us to think anew. Clearly, for many, his has done this.
We should be focused on gleaning techniques and ways of thinking from various sources to build what works for us as individuals. I have my own rules, and I don’t expect them to work for everyone.
Clearly we’re on common ground, but will never be exactly aligned. Nevertheless, we can all sit on the same side of the table and be happy about such good company.
Good blog, good discussion and good fortune to all,
Clair
Sep 21st, 2008
Kevin
@FLNonny: Then I must be the only person in the world who sticks to his budget and uses a credit card. I doubt it. In fact, other readers have posted saying they can use them well, too.
@Clair: Agreed; that’s why I’ve said I support most of his plan. The anti-credit stance is what I have beef with for the most part (and the paying lower interest first part).
@everyone else: Please re-read the post. I’m not saying Ramsey is a terrible person and his plan never works. I’m saying every plan out there can use some tweaking… it has flaws. That’s my point.
Sep 22nd, 2008
Todd
Okay, I haven’t taken the time to read all of the comments, but I thought I would leave my two-cents on this blog post. First off: THE ONLY WRONG WAY TO PAY OFF DEBT IS TO NOT PAY OFF DEBT.
A little background: 23 years-old, $100,000 student loan debt, $7,500 consumer debt, $7,500 debt to relative and just bought a house. The 8 total debts add up to $115K, $240K including mortgage. (I know, that all makes me sound hypocritical to my first note above.)
I recently read Dave Ramsey’s TMM book and must say that his plan–the snowball debt plan–is most appealing to me. I have 8 debt payments, including my mortgage, that are paying off debts with balances ranging from $750 to $67,000.
To make a long story short, I graduated with an engineering degree so I am all about the numbers. On top of that, I consider myself very productive with Excel. With that being said, I set up a very comprehensive spreadsheet equipped with macros that when executed: 1) created a list of permutations of the 8 debts–40,320 in all, 2) “plugged” in their current balance, interest rate, monthly payment, and “snowball” amount,
3) added up the entire amount of payments after debt = $0, and 4) sorted those total payment amounts for every permutation from least to greatest.
What I found was that difference between the least amount paid and the greatest amount paid was only $6,000 (compared to these totals of nearly $325,000)—so less than 2% difference.
If I were to pay off the loan with the largest interest rate (which happens to be the $67K student loan), then it would take nearly 5.5 years to pay off. However, if I knock some of those little consumer debts out of the way then I end up paying off 4 of them within 2.5 years. As always, the mathematical part of me tells me to do it “your way”, but the psychological part of me says to gain that debt reduction confidence and pay off those little debts—which is exactly what I am doing now. Note: once I obtain that “confidence” I fully intend to switch to the best mathematical solution.
Other than that I completely agree with your opinion of Ramsey. Specifically, I have thee rewards credit card that pays for utilities, select bills, gas, and sometime groceries WITH the money sitting in my account waiting to pay the credit card off when the statement arrives.
Thanks for the great blog post!
Sep 24th, 2008
TMS
@ Kevin, FLNONNY, Troy, and NTJS:
Looks like I may be a few days late with responding to these recent posts, but I am still going to contribute.
Big fan of Dave Ramsey…big fan of Kevin’s arguments….big fan of credit cards. Everyone is correct…
Last year I used credit cards for the “fixed” expenses (utilities, eligible student loans repayments, cable/cell phone, fuel, vehicle maintenance, — in other words, expenses that are impulse that have to be paid month-to-month) AND I used a debit card/cash for “impulse” expenses (groceries, clothes, retail, occasional dining out etc.).
I paid the credit card off each month, was charged a total of $0 in interest/fees/finance charges/etc; I earned $1500+ in credit card rewards but $0 in debit card rewards; that money is now making money for me in a Roth IRA and will be for at least 35 years (~$40,000?)
PLUS…. My brother no longer carries cash/debit cards because he was mugged a few years back, had $45 stolen and $1,200 spent before he could cancel the debit card (never got it back); on the other hand his credit cards were never harmed because he was able to stop payment and cancel the transaction(s). Which brings me to my next point: Why don’t store clerks ever check ID’s anymore?!?!
Sep 30th, 2008
GHolmes
@TMS
My math has you losing (1,500-2763.6) in purchasing power!
Lets assume you have 2% rewards card and never make a mistake in paying bills. For the 1,500 you would have charged $75,000 (1,500/.02).
Now lets assume you were my only customer and I was your only “source of goods” . My merchant fees average 3.29% of credit card sales. 75,000*.0329=2467.50. My cost of capital is 12%. Since I am not in business to break even I am marking up my goods. 2467.5*1.12=2,763.6.
Sep 30th, 2008
TMS
@GHOLMES
I will be the first to admit I am not an expert in business, purchasing power, behind-the-scene credit card extraordinaire or anything like that, BUT when I receive an electric bill for $30, for instance, I am going to pay $30 regardless of what type of payment I use. I have never received a credit card statement that added on a few extra dollars to make up for my use of a credit card nor have I ever received a bill the following month that tacked on a fee for using.
The reality of it is I am not the only customer to any single business, I am not the only person using a credit card, and I have multiple sources of goods; I also understand your example above. With that being said, if I translate your example above correctly, then in reality when I use a debit card/cash without any reward benefits to purchase $75K then I would be losing more in purchasing power (0 - 2763.6) because I would being getting marked-up for that 12% despite not using a credit card. On top of that, I would have never received that $1,500 that was thrown into a Roth IRA to produce more money. [If you feel I have completely misunderstood this concept feel free to explain more or link me to a good website that does....you have sparked my curiosity!]
Also, I don’t mind saying its 3% card with a rewards benefit that gives back $1.25 per $1.00 after a certain amount of rewards has been built up.
Sep 30th, 2008
GHolmes
@TMS
You are so right that it is very confusing and easy to hide the true cost of that credit card. If you wrote a check to Visa for $2,763 to get $1,500 you would not do it. So it is hidden.
You get $1,500 from Visa (75,000*.02).
Merchants pay Visa $2,467.5 (75,000*.0329).
You pay Merchants 2,763 (2,467.5*12). So you are out .
Before rebate cards you could have bought 75,000 in goods now you can only buy 73,737 (75,000+1500-2763).
As the banks keep issuing credit to folks that cant pay the higher our fees will become. Visa passes the cost to the merchants who have to make a profit not just break even.
Sorry no website I dabbled in Economics while in college. I put the math out there for folks who are wiser can see if there is a flaw in the calculation.
Sep 30th, 2008
GHolmes
@TMS
As far as the utility bill 30. If you were the only customer the cost of to the company is only 98 cents. (30*.0329). I doubt they would raise thier rate.
However, as more of society uses credit cards/debit cards (by signing them) the more costs to the utility company it is going to be.
Watch the TV commercials and how they are marketing to our generation. Why is it so eay to get credit cards?
Because the bank made $967 on your 30 day loan so you could pay your fixed expenses.
Sep 30th, 2008
Paul
Re: Credit Card Use,
I recently heard a clip of Dave arguing against the use of credit cards by saying something to the effect of “I don’t know any millionaires who use credit cards”, and people who use credit cards are “nerds” and “losers”.
I guess his experience early in his career has made him speak this way, but I find his attitude completely condescending. It is always ironic to me that some people who speak the most about their Christian faith are sometimes so degrading to others, and in Ramsey’s case, it does seem that he is wrapped up in getting money.
Oct 1st, 2008
LAL
Actually a lot of millionaires use CC and rewards. How do you think they became rich? Read the middle class millionaire.
By the way FLNONNY and everyone else who says CC are bad, where is this 12-18% Study?
EVERY PF blogger and I’ve asked a Harvard Economics professor about this study in class, NO one has ever seen it! No one has a hard copy! He said it’s a myth that the study was done. If it were a valid study it should be available online!
It should be in the economics library. It should be published so people can read and rebute these statistical finding. It’s a very basic principal. You publish your findings.
So this study doesn’t exist. It’s quote by Dave Ramsey, it’s quoted by his followers, but where is the study? Let’s see the pdf?
By the way I told my DH, and he asked his MBA classmates. NO one has ever seen that study, which TRUST me marketing people would love to use and hand about!
So until you produce this study stop quoting it. And Dave Ramsey should stop as well. He is promoting false information.
Oct 3rd, 2008
Kimberly
@LAL
I think you’re looking for an earlier study, but here’s one published in Septmeber 2008 - I haven’t evaluated it myself, and I’ve never agreed with the underlying principle, but here you go, just get the journal article:
A four-part study found what many financial planners already knew: People spend more money when using credit cards compared to cash purchases. People also spend less when they look at their expenses in detail, the researchers found.
Consumers simply feel the pain of paying more when they part with cash, the researchers, led by Priya Raghubir at New York University, write in the September issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
* In one study, 114 participants estimated how much they would spend using cash vs. credit for a well-described restaurant meal. “People are willing to spend (or pay) more when they use a credit card than when using cash,” the authors wrote.
* In a second test, researchers highlighted the future pain of paying by having 57 participants estimate food expenses for an imaginary Thanksgiving dinner item by item, rather than just as a total. When they did this, the cash-credit spending gap closed. When people confronted the detailed reality of expenses, it no longer mattered whether they used cash or something else, the scientists conclude.
* Then 28 participants were given a detailed shopping list to work with. In a questionnaire format, spent more when they used a $50 gift certificate instead of $50 cash.
* Finally, 130 participants were given $1 cash or a $1 gift certificate to buy candy. At first, they were more willing to spend the gift certificate than the cash. But after holding the gift certificate in their wallets for an hour, they became less likely to spend it, indicating the the certificates came to seem more like real money.
“The studies suggest that less transparent payment forms [such as credit cards] tend to be treated like [play] money and are hence more easily spent (or parted with),” the researchers argue.
Oct 3rd, 2008
Kevin
@Todd: $6,000 is $6,000 though, right? If I was standing in front of you and said you can have $6,000 or not, which would you choose?
Regarding debt repayment confidence: why not consider making all of your payments on time (or making additional payments) as a buildup to your confidence?
Otherwise, glad you agree on the other points.
@TMS: Thanks for sharing. Glad you see the beneficial side of credit cards.
@GHolmes: I really think your point is irrelevant. You’re never in a “only buyer/only supplier” situation. It’s a cost of doing business that you would pay even if you didn’t use credit cards. I see your point, really, I do. If no one used credit cards then theoretically your cost of goods would be lower and your purchasing power would be higher. But I don’t see credit cards going anywhere… ever. They are here to stay. So why not earn returns? (But I did enjoy reading your back and forth with TMS)
@Paul: You wouldn’t happen to have a link to that clip, would you?
@LAL and Kimberly: Anyone have a link to that study? And I don’t exactly consider 114 to 130 participants to be enough to say for all the people in the United States, that these things hold true. Awfully small sample size.
Oct 3rd, 2008
Paul
I found the clip on YouTube–http://www.y