<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another Reason to Avoid Large Tax Refunds</title> <atom:link href="http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds</link> <description>A personal finance blog teaching you how to live debt free and use credit wisely.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Weekly Wrap Up February 20-28 &#124; Personal Finance Firewall</title><link>http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/#comment-12499</link> <dc:creator>Weekly Wrap Up February 20-28 &#124; Personal Finance Firewall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:47:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nodebtplan.net/?p=1997#comment-12499</guid> <description>[...] California decided paying tax refunds is for suckers [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California decided paying tax refunds is for suckers [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/#comment-11761</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nodebtplan.net/?p=1997#comment-11761</guid> <description>@Jake: Yea, I didn&#039;t think California was alone with this problem. At least Kansas fixed it.
@Do You Dave Ramsey?: I can imagine many states having to do it next year if they don&#039;t make drastic changes to their budgets. Cash is king, as always.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jake: Yea, I didn&#8217;t think California was alone with this problem. At least Kansas fixed it.</p><p>@Do You Dave Ramsey?: I can imagine many states having to do it next year if they don&#8217;t make drastic changes to their budgets. Cash is king, as always.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Do You Dave Ramsey?</title><link>http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/#comment-11715</link> <dc:creator>Do You Dave Ramsey?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nodebtplan.net/?p=1997#comment-11715</guid> <description>Very insightful post.  As we work through this tax season we should all examine our refunds and tweak our w-2s accordingly.
Without question CA is doing something unique but I promise other states will follow suite in future years.
But the truth is that YOUR cash in hand is always better than waiting for the governments to give it back.
Thanks for sharing.
Dave</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful post.  As we work through this tax season we should all examine our refunds and tweak our w-2s accordingly.</p><p>Without question CA is doing something unique but I promise other states will follow suite in future years.</p><p>But the truth is that YOUR cash in hand is always better than waiting for the governments to give it back.</p><p>Thanks for sharing.<br
/> Dave</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jake</title><link>http://www.nodebtplan.net/2009/02/22/another-reason-to-avoid-large-tax-refunds/#comment-11713</link> <dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nodebtplan.net/?p=1997#comment-11713</guid> <description>Kansas was in the same situation, but we&#039;ve already fixed it...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas was in the same situation, but we&#8217;ve already fixed it&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
